Cleaning Up the Government: Black, White and Grey Corners and Public Expectations


So did public frustration make the government do the right thing in the NParks Brompton controversy? By all accounts, if it were not for the online complaints, the Brompton bikes purchases would have gone unnoticed and also swept under the carpet.  The online mob is in a lynching mood, encouraged by the government’s purging of its ranks recently.

A school principal and other civil servants were castigated in an underaged hooker case.  The topmost officers in the SCDF and CNB were hauled in for corruption charges, unusual as most corruption cases were in the ranks and file. Now, at least one NParks staff is embroiled in a scandal regarding at best, misuse of taxpayers money or worse, corruption.  The government is making a show of cleaning up since the last GE and if the momentum keeps going, an MP or even a minister might be next if a whistle-blower steps in to give damning information on wrongdoing to work up public anger.

“Damning information” is however easy to come by and believed as we are frustrated and have evolved into a society cynical of the government’s intentions and integrity. This is not a bad development as long as it is part of the overall psyche of being cynical of all political-business agendas and machinery e.g. from governments, their contractors, the lobbies, the activists and the media.

The underaged hooker and sex-for-contracts cases are still in the court’s hands, and in the NParks case there is no formal charge yet until CPIB decides to. However, the court of public opinion has decided on the wrongs and wrongdoers already. The underaged hooker and sex-for-contracts cases are clearer on the black and white as more information has been revealed.

The grey NParks case is most telling of public bloodlust as there is no actual crime confirmed yet. The anger evolved from one of use of taxpayers money ,which is not the real issue as “value” over an item purchased is subjective, to one of civil servants personally benefiting from public contracts warded. From what was disclosed by the media and Internet CSI,  the practice is actually not uncommon in the private sector. The bikes purchases are actually legitimate as long as the NParks staff did not receive any personal kickbacks and proper paperwork, versus doctored paperwork, was done.  Opportunities are given to suppliers one knows and trusts, while there is some cynicism towards certain suppliers based on fair or unfair assumptions.  Suppliers who did not get the contracts might become upset over lost opportunities and get even.

Nevertheless, in the Brompton bikes case, regardless of who started the whistle-blowing in the Internet, we expect public servants to have higher standards of  “right” and “clean” behaviour, double-standards though it may be. Whatever practices that works in the private sector, cannot apply in the public sector. It does not matter whether the purchase was legitimate, it must be seen as legitimate as far as public expectation goes.

Advertisements

3 responses

  1. Pingback: Daily SG: 26 July 2012 | The Singapore Daily

  2. watchman

    The bike deal was definitely bias towards bikehop and brompton based on specifications. And yes, the bike deal is above-board only if it can be proven that nparks officers involved in the purchase did not get any personal favours in return. Maybe they really did not get any favours and just wanted cool bikes to ride at work. Then controversial question of taxpayers money and whether it was well spent.

    July 26, 2012 at 12:31 pm

  3. Yamasam

    I don’t agree there is a double standard.

    In the private sector, the money belongs to the shareholders. It is up to the shareholders if they can accept such practices and how their businesses are conducted. That is their prerogative. The public has no right to interfere.

    On the other hand, where tax-payers monies are concerned, it is within the rights of the public to query any purchase that is questionable. If some individuals had not been persistent in pursuing the NParks case, the issue would have ended after the minister had spoken out in defence of the purchase.

    July 26, 2012 at 10:16 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s