The New Mock Parliamentarians

With the 12th Parliament in sitting, it is out with the old, in with the new. Outgoing 9 NMPs are Calvin Cheng Ern Lee, Terry Lee Kok Hua, Viswaroopan s/o Sadasivan, Mildred Tan-Sim Beng Mei, Paulin Tay Straughan, Teo Siong Seng, Laurence Wee Yoke Thong, Audrey Wong Wai Yen and Joscelin Yeo Wei Ling. The incoming 9 NMPs on a 2.5 years term are Eugene Tan, Teo Siong Seng, Tan Su Shan, Ramasamy Dhinakaran, Nicholas Fang, Mary Liew, Laurence Lien, Faizah Jamal and Janice Koh.

The deadline for NMP application was on December 8 last year and initial reports were that there were more than 20 people aspiring to be mock parliamentarians.  Eventually, it was a record high of 50 applicants and there were only 47 eligible candidates, of which 9 were selected, 9 being the maximum number of NMPs allowed. The burning question is who were the 3 applicants unqualified in the eyes of the Special Select Committee. Of the 9, Eugene Tan is a regular commentator on local politics and I admit I’m largely unfamiliar with the remainder 8 NMPs.

The arguments against the NMPs have been repeated ad nauseum. However, they hold considerable merit if one believes in the Westminster system. NMPs are not elected by the people, do not represent party interests and do not represent any geographical constituency like in traditional parliaments. The NMPs are seen as coming from 7 segments of society – Business and industry, professions, labour movement, social service organisations, civic and people sector, tertiary education institutions, and media, arts and sports. Which just says that the NMPs come from anywhere and can lobby anything.

The 9 are not elected by the people but selected by the Special Select Committee which consists of the speaker, 6 PAP MPs and Low Thia Khiang. This invites generally unfair criticisms that the NMPs are planted PAP yes-men and yes-women. Nevertheless, Walter Woon, Siew Kum Hong and Braema Mathiaparanam were anything but PAP plants, except to the cynical conspiracy theory advocate.

That said, the mock MP or NMP idea is rejected outright by the opposition. In 1992, the 3 SDP and 1 WP MPs, Cheo Chai Chen, Chiam See Tong, Ling How Doong and Low Thia Khiang, voted against it. On the PAP side, only Tan Cheng Bock voted against his party’s bill.  They understood that having NMPs would encourage a crutch mentality among Singaporeans ie. Singaporeans would not vote in opposition MPs and instead rely on NMPs to stir up debates with the PAP in parliament. A fair statement as opposition MP representation has not really increased since 1990 when the NMP scheme was introduced. The NMP scheme hinders rather than helps democracy in Singapore.


4 responses

  1. Gerald Heng Sr

    As for the NMP we the Singapore Quitters of thye 1960’s till now should get appointed because we represent the departed “Stray Dogs” that still love the smells, sights and haunts of Singapore a First Rate Economic Country but not yet a First Class Parliament like say that of Westminster,London, UK ! We too don’t have Constituents but it doesn’t follow we don’t Love and Passionately Care about Singapore and our Singaporean Brothers, Sisters and Comrades ! In France sometime ago they have had Deputies represented from Algeria and the French Colonies !Majullah Singapore, Tak Boleh Mahjong dan Berchara dalam Raayat Parliament !Kersian bukan ? Nasib Hilang Lah di-Dunia !

    Gerald Heng Sr.
    Metrowest Boston/Cambridge ,MA.USA.

    February 3, 2012 at 7:35 am

  2. Pingback: Daily SG: 3 Feb 2012 « The Singapore Daily


    NMP are a joke. It is the tactic of the fake democratic feudal dynasty style political system aims to perpetuate the ruling of the MIWs. It is unconstitutional because there is no referendum to approve it. In fact, the constitutions is like toilet paper that can be flushed away and replaced by new one once MIWs used to clean its shit. Note here shit to the MIWs is not necessarily shit to the people. That is, so long as the MIWs sensed that the constitutions provided some loophole to threaten its perpetuated rule they would never hesitate to change the constitutions to suit themselves rather than the people or the country. This is the facts. SAD.

    February 4, 2012 at 1:53 am

  4. chemgen


    Nothing against the NMPs themselves and best wishes to them, and yes the scheme is a sad joke on Singaporeans.

    February 7, 2012 at 2:57 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s